hit counter script
Download
Share
Print this page
LG dlhx4072 series How To Use Manual
  1. Manuals
  2. Brands
  3. LG Manuals
  4. Dryer
  5. DLHX4072 series
  6. How to use manual
LG dlhx4072 series How To Use Manual

LG dlhx4072 series How To Use Manual

Hide thumbs Also See for dlhx4072 series:

Advertisement

Quick Links

Download this manual See also: Owner's Manual
CODE OF PRACTICE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TAUGHT PROGRAMMES
Effective date: March 2016.
The Code of Practice on the Assessment of Taught Programmes applies to all taught
programmes which lead to an award of the University, including validated programmes.
1.
General Principles
The University is committed to ensuring that:
- the principles, procedures and processes of assessment are explicit;
- the assessment methods and practices used in programmes are effective in
measuring student attainment of the range of intended learning outcomes,
with due regard to relevant subject benchmark statements, national
qualifications frameworks, and requirements of relevant professional, statutory
and/or regulatory bodies (PSRBs);
- the assessment of programmes is valid, reliable, consistent and fair;
- assessment promotes effective student learning.
2.
Dissemination of information and guidance on assessment
Information for students
Information about the University's assessment regime and appeals procedures is
included in the following publications:
Information provided centrally
Guide to Undergraduate Assessment, Guide to Assessment for Taught
Postgraduate Students and Examination arrangements: what you need to know...
The following information is included in the Guide to Undergraduate/Postgraduate
Assessment or Examination arrangements: what you need to know... or in the case of
Greenlands based programmes the relevant Programme Handbook or the Guide to
sitting exams:
the periods within which centrally administered examinations are held;
-
the University marking and grading conventions;
-
procedures in relation to medical and other extenuating circumstances;
-
general information on the consequences of assessment (progression/award,
-
re-examination) and the right of appeal (Senate Standing Committee on
Examination Results and procedures for review of irregularities in relation to
module marks);
academic misconduct;
-
dates and location of publication of results;
-
re-examination arrangements.
-
1

Advertisement

loading

Related Manuals for LG dlhx4072 series

Summary of Contents for LG dlhx4072 series

  • Page 1 CODE OF PRACTICE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TAUGHT PROGRAMMES Effective date: March 2016. The Code of Practice on the Assessment of Taught Programmes applies to all taught programmes which lead to an award of the University, including validated programmes. General Principles The University is committed to ensuring that: - the principles, procedures and processes of assessment are explicit;...
  • Page 2 Examinations Office website The following are available on the Examinations Office website (http//www.reading.ac.uk/Exams): Guide to Undergraduate Assessment/ Guide to Postgraduate Assessment (Taught Programmes) Examination arrangements: what you need to know… Code of Practice on the Assessment of Taught Programmes; Code of Practice on the External Examining of Taught Programmes; University-wide Framework for Classification and Progression for First Degrees, which inter alia provide descriptors of student attainment in relation to degree classifications;...
  • Page 3 A record of the dates for submission of coursework should be held in the relevant School/Departmental office and be made available to relevant Programme Directors. Information for staff In addition to the codes of practice and the classification frameworks, information on assessment policy and procedures is available in the University Examination and Assessment Procedures Handbook, which is available on the Examinations Office website.
  • Page 4 deadlines for submission of major pieces of assessed coursework and for dates for feedback. Schools are required to ensure that staff-student liaison committees include consideration of assessment matters in their business at least once in their annual cycle, and that they have the opportunity to consider relevant External Examiners’...
  • Page 5 Any potential conflict of interest must be declared to the Head of School or Dean. The University does not permit any member of staff who is in an intimate relationship with a student to be directly professionally involved in assessing or examining that student.
  • Page 6 the examination and dispatched to the nominated recipient. The Chief Invigilator is responsible for providing with the script relevant information if the examination was held under abnormal conditions or was subject to special provisions. University examinations shall normally be invigilated either by members of academic staff or by external invigilators, approved by the Examinations Officer.
  • Page 7 these provisions is included in the Examinations and Assessment Procedures Handbook, Section 11, and in Examination arrangements: what you need to know. Special arrangements in University examinations Provision for students with specific learning difficulties Students who have been assessed as having specific learning difficulties may apply for special arrangements in examinations.
  • Page 8 Procedures for submission of coursework Students, when submitting a major piece of coursework, are required to append to their work a signed statement confirming that the work is their own. The minimum information to be included in the statement of original authorship is specified in the Examinations and Assessment Procedures Handbook, Section 15.
  • Page 9 granted and the work submitted by the revised deadline no penalty will be applied. Extensions will only be granted for good reason. Through the extenuating circumstances procedures, students may request removal of a penalty imposed for late submission of work. Such a penalty will only be removed for very good reason.
  • Page 10 http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/FILES/qualitysupport/penaltiesforlatesubmission.pdf Students are informed in the Guide to Undergraduate Assessment/Guide to Postgraduate Assessment (Taught Programmes) that it is advisable to submit work in an unfinished state rather than to fail to submit any work. Academic Misconduct The Senate has agreed the following statement in respect of academic misconduct: ‘Cheating, which is the attempt to gain an advantage for oneself or another by deceit, and other misconduct are breaches of discipline under the University’s...
  • Page 11 (v) Collusion: acting with another student with the intention to deceive. Cheating and other academic misconduct in written examinations (including in-class tests and examinations administered by a School/Department) include, but are not restricted to: Taking into the examination hall, or possessing while in the examination hall, any books, memoranda, notes or other similar material (including material held electronically) except that students are permitted to deposit such material in an area designated by the...
  • Page 12 Candidates are not allowed to leave the examination before it has finished without the permission of the invigilator or to leave the examination room temporarily for any purpose without the permission of the invigilator. Invigilators are authorised to instruct candidates who are talking or behaving in a disruptive manner to leave the room.
  • Page 13 Classification and Progression for First Degrees for the appropriate cohort. Generic assessment criteria relating to mark ranges and classifications for taught postgraduate programmes are provided in the Marking Criteria and Classification Framework for Taught Postgraduate Programmes for the appropriate cohort. Students should be informed, and periodically reminded, of the generic assessment criteria relevant to their degree.
  • Page 14 • at least one exemplar of each class for which marks are given (nearest to the midpoint of the mark range for the class) • all borderline candidates (see section 7.5.1 of the Framework for Classification and Progression) • all failed candidates •...
  • Page 15 Where a piece of work has been referred to a third marker, following an irreconcilable difference between the first and second markers, the third marker should prepare a brief report on the resolution of the mark. Records of internal moderation must be made available to the External Examiner. External Moderation The University requires that the standard and consistency of the marking of assessments which contribute directly to an award be confirmed by the...
  • Page 16 Representative are an accurate record of the recommended marks. The Examination Representative is responsible for ensuring that marks for each module are reported accurately to Programme Examiners’ Meetings and, in accordance with a published schedule of dates, to the Examinations Officer, as appropriate.
  • Page 17 guidance on their performance in the written examination for the relevant module which identifies the strengths and weaknesses of their performance and indicates how they might improve their performance. In the case of students who are not resitting, more generic feedback, which does not address the individual case, may be appropriate.
  • Page 18 The standard rules for progression from Part 1 to Part 2, and from Part 2 to Part 3, in the post-2002 programme structure are specified in the University-wide Framework for Classification and Progression for First Degrees. The available results are: Failed A candidate who has failed to achieve a threshold performance shall be stated to have failed.
  • Page 19 Other results (available at undergraduate and postgraduate level) An Aegrotat degree may be awarded to a candidate who is prevented by reason of illness from completing the assessment for a degree, subject to the provisions of Ordinance X. A candidate may at the discretion of the Faculty Examiners be deemed not to have sat the examination if the candidate has been prevented from sitting the examination by illness or other good cause or if the candidate’s performance in the examination has been significantly affected by illness or other serious...
  • Page 20 Markers and personal tutors have the right to attend and to participate fully in the consideration of marks and results, and should be encouraged to do so. Quorum A Programme Examiners’ Meeting shall normally be deemed inquorate if fewer than half the nominated Internal Examiners are present. Exceptionally, with the agreement of the Chair, an alternate may attend in place of an Internal Examiner.
  • Page 21 special consideration in marking, together with a note of those assessments in which the recommendation was applied. The meeting should be advised of any changes to procedures, any particular circumstances affecting a specific assessment for a module, or any generic issue relevant to the consideration of results.
  • Page 22 Minutes must be kept of the Special Cases Sub-Committee and should be held in the School/Department. Minutes must be kept of Programme Examiners’ Meetings in accordance with the University Template for Programme Examiners’ Meetings, which is available through the Examinations Office website. The Minutes should be held in the School/Department and a copy should be sent to the Examinations Officer.
  • Page 23 Faculty Examiners’ Meetings Powers In respect of undergraduate Final Examinations and postgraduate Examinations to recommend to the Senate results for awards to receive and consider recommendations in respect of aegrotat awards to receive recommendations from the Special Cases Sub-Committee of the Programme Examiners’...
  • Page 24 Information presented to the meeting and all discussion of candidates and results is strictly confidential to the meeting and to those officers of the University who have good reason to be provided with such information. Examiners and those attending the Meeting are required to disclose to the Meeting any conflict of interest.
  • Page 25 Recording, documentation and publication of assessment decisions The Secretary to the Programme Examiners’ Meeting is responsible for ensuring that the decisions of the meeting are recorded accurately. The Examination Representative is responsible for ensuring the accuracy of marks and results submitted to the Examinations Office.
  • Page 26 have failed or in which they have a restricted pass, except in the case of candidates for programmes offered through the College of Estate Management who have the right to be re-examined on two occasions following the first attempt. For progression purposes, the mark to be used in calculating the aggregate is the higher of the mark achieved at re-examination and the mark achieved at the first attempt.
  • Page 27 The University’s external examining system is designed to ensure the evaluation and maintenance of academic standards and their comparability with those of other institutions. External Examiners’ Reports are reviewed by the Pro-Vice- Chancellor and the Teaching and Learning Dean. Boards of Studies and the Staff- Student Liaison Committee consider the reports.
  • Page 28 Approved: February 2008; amended September 2009, September 2010, September 2011, October 2012, January 2014, October 2014, June 2015, March 2016.